The New York Times reports on a lawsuit by the Havasupai Indians against Arizona State University, concerning researchers’ use of tribe members’ genetic data.Â (This article may also be of interest: It’s a fascinating story about Henrietta Lacks, her cervical cancer and what researchers did with it; the storyÂ raises questions about the privacy of a personâ€™s medical data and what rights a person has to their own tissue.) The Times reports:
Members of the tiny, isolated tribe had given DNA samples to university researchers starting in 1990, in the hope that they might provide genetic clues to the tribeâ€™s devastating rate of diabetes. But they learned that their blood samples had been used to study many other things, including mental illness and theories of the tribeâ€™s geographical origins that contradict their traditional stories.
The geneticist responsible for the research has said that she had obtained permission for wider-ranging genetic studies.
Acknowledging a desire to â€œremedy the wrong that was done,â€ the universityâ€™s Board of Regents on Tuesday agreed to pay $700,000 to 41 of the tribeâ€™s members, return the blood samples and provide other forms of assistance to the impoverished Havasupai â€” a settlement that legal experts said was significant because it implied that the rights of research subjects can be violated when they are not fully informed about how their DNA might be used. […]
But genetics experts and civil rights advocates say it may also fuel a growing debate over researchersâ€™ responsibility to communicate the range of personal information that can be gleaned from DNA at a time when it is being collected on an ever-greater scale for research and routine medical care. […]
Researchers and institutions that receive federal funds are required to receive â€œinformed consentâ€ from subjects, ensuring that they understand the risks and benefits before they participate. But such protections were designed primarily for research that carried physical risks, like experimental drug trials or surgery. When it comes to mining DNA, the rules â€” and the risks â€” are murkier. […]
The Havasupai settlement appears to be the first payment to individuals who said their DNA was misused, several legal experts said, and came after the university spent $1.7 million fighting lawsuits by tribe members.