InformationWeek reports on issues concerning children’s medical and genetic privacy:
For decades, hospitals have conducted blood tests on newborns,Â checking babiesÂ for various conditions, treatable and not. Today’s less costly tests, genomic research, and technological advances, coupled with differing policies across states, worry some privacy and ethics advocates.
Whereas some states allow parents to opt-in for testing, others have an opt-out approach. Critics argue parents have little to no say in whether this data is collected, where and how long it’s stored, and what organizations do with this information. Lower genome testing costs sparked debate about researchers’ right to use this information; who should learn of infants’ chronic conditions and when; and the type of data government, researchers, payers, or healthcare providers can cull. Other concerns surround the storage and transmission of data that’s not de-identified and its potential theft. […]
In May, Minnesota Gov. Mark DaytonÂ signed a lawÂ allowing the state to indefinitely store blood spots for future research. Parents can opt out. In New York, parents can decline testing forÂ religious reasons, said the Wadsworth Center, NY Department of Health, which screens the state’s newborns forÂ more than 40Â inherited metabolic conditions.