Search


  • Categories


  • Archives

    « Home

    Atlantic: Philosopher Whose Fingerprints Are All Over the FTC’s New Approach to Privacy

    The Atlantic takes an in-depth look at philosopher Helen Nissenbaum and how the Federal Trade Commission is using her theories on privacy in the agency’s approach to the protection of consumers’ data:

    PALO ALTO — A mile or two away from Facebook’s headquarters in Silicon Valley, Helen Nissenbaum of New York University was standing in a basement on Stanford’s campus explaining that the entire way that we’ve thought about privacy on the Internet is wrong. […]

    Nissenbaum’s March presentation was part of Stanford’s Program on Liberation Technology and relied heavily on her influential recent research, which culminated in the 2010 book, Privacy in Context, and subsequent papers like “A Contextual Approach to Privacy Online.”

    But the most important product of Nissenbaum’s work does not have her byline. She’s played a vital role in reshaping the way our country’s top regulators think about consumer data. As one measure of her success, the recent Federal Trade Commission report, “Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change,” which purports to lay out a long-term privacy framework for legislators, businesses, and citizens, uses the word context an astounding 85 times

    Given the intellectual influence she’s had, it’s important to understand how what she’s saying is different from other privacy theorists. The standard explanation for privacy freakouts is that people get upset because they’ve “lost control” of data about themselves or there is simply too much data available.

    Nissenbaum argues that the real problem “is the inapproproriateness of the flow of information due to the mediation of technology.” In her scheme, there are senders and receivers of messages, who communicate different types of information with very specific expectations of how it will be used. Privacy violations occur not when too much data accumulates or people can’t direct it, but when one of the receivers or transmission principles change. The key academic term is “context-relative informational norms.” Bust a norm and people get upset. […]

    Nissenbaum gets us past thinking about privacy as a binary: either something is private or something is public. Nissenbaum puts the context — or social situation — back into the equation. What you tell your bank, you might not tell your doctor. What you tell your friend, you might not tell your father-in-law. What you allow a next-door neighbor to know, you might not allow Google’s Street View car to know. Furthermore, these differences in information sharing are not bad or good; they are just the norms.

    Read the full article for more on Nissenbaum’s theories about privacy.

    One Response to “Atlantic: Philosopher Whose Fingerprints Are All Over the FTC’s New Approach to Privacy”

    1. Tweets that mention » Privacy Lives: Atlantic: Philosopher Whose Fingerprints Are All Over the FTC’s New Approach to Privacy Says:

      […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by privacyfocused, nymphosec, privacyactivism, bannedfromoz, bendrath, bklem, stoprealidnow, and twistedpolitics. twistedpolitics said: […]

    Leave a Reply