<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Privacy Lives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.privacylives.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.privacylives.com</link>
	<description>monitoring the pulse of privacy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Federal Court Upholds New Hampshire Prescription Privacy Law</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/federal-court-upholds-new-hampshire-prescription-privacy-law/2008/11/20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/federal-court-upholds-new-hampshire-prescription-privacy-law/2008/11/20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Medical data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, I was co-counsel on an amicus curiae brief (pdf) in IMS Health v. Ayotte, a case about a New Hampshire state law that banned the sale of prescriber-identifiable prescription drug data for marketing purposes. This week, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld (pdf) the New Hampshire law. This decision overturns the ruling (pdf) of the lower [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/federal-court-upholds-new-hampshire-prescription-privacy-law/2008/11/20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ars Technica: FOIA docs show feds can lojack mobiles without telco help</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/ars-technica-foia-docs-show-feds-can-lojack-mobiles-without-telco-help/2008/11/19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/ars-technica-foia-docs-show-feds-can-lojack-mobiles-without-telco-help/2008/11/19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disclosure: I am currently a Visiting Scholar at the ACLU.
Ars Technica has an interesting story concerning documents released under the Freedom of Information Act to the ACLU and EFF.
Courts in recent years have been raising the evidentiary bar law enforcement agents must meet in order to obtain historical cell phone records that reveal information about a target&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/ars-technica-foia-docs-show-feds-can-lojack-mobiles-without-telco-help/2008/11/19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: Early Test for Obama on Domestic Spying Views</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-early-test-for-obama-on-domestic-spying-views/2008/11/18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-early-test-for-obama-on-domestic-spying-views/2008/11/18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Presidential transition]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times has an interesting story on some privacy and civil liberty questions surrounding the National Security Agency&#8217;s warrantless wiretapping program that the Obama administration will face early on.
The Justice Department will be asked to respond to motions in legal challenges to the National Security Agency’s wiretapping program, and must decide whether to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-early-test-for-obama-on-domestic-spying-views/2008/11/18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&#038;T Backs New Group Focusing on Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/att-backs-new-group-focusing-on-privacy/2008/11/17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/att-backs-new-group-focusing-on-privacy/2008/11/17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Presidential transition]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News sources are reporting that AT&#38;T is funding a group to focus on standards for commercial use of consumer data. According to the Washington Post:
The group, the Future of Privacy Forum, will be led by Jules Polonetsky, who until this month was in charge of AOL&#8217;s privacy policy, and Chris Wolf, a privacy lawyer for law [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/att-backs-new-group-focusing-on-privacy/2008/11/17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada, New York Release Privacy Guides for Businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/canada-new-york-release-privacy-guides-for-businesses/2008/11/14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/canada-new-york-release-privacy-guides-for-businesses/2008/11/14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Privacy Commissioner of Canada and the New York Consumer Protection Board have both issued privacy guides for businesses.
The New York Consumer Protection Board’s &#8220;Business Privacy Guide&#8221; (pdf) explains &#8220;how to handle personal identifiable information and limit the prospects of identity theft.&#8221; The guide notes that, &#8220;After California, New York leads the nation in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/canada-new-york-release-privacy-guides-for-businesses/2008/11/14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deadline for Public Comment on Canadian Camera Surveillance Guidelines Is Nov. 14</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/deadline-for-public-comment-on-canadian-camera-surveillance-guidelines-is-nov-14/2008/11/13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/deadline-for-public-comment-on-canadian-camera-surveillance-guidelines-is-nov-14/2008/11/13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In October, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada&#8217;s office announced it &#8220;has prepared a draft guidance document that sets out good practice rules for private sector organizations that are either contemplating or using covert video surveillance.&#8221; The Commissioner asked for public comment  on the draft guidance, which sets out a test to determine whether an organization [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/deadline-for-public-comment-on-canadian-camera-surveillance-guidelines-is-nov-14/2008/11/13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Academic Articles on Privacy Generally and As Connected With Border Security</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/two-academic-articles-on-privacy-generally-and-as-connected-with-border-security/2008/11/13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/two-academic-articles-on-privacy-generally-and-as-connected-with-border-security/2008/11/13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both found via PogoWasRight.org.
Here are two academic articles about privacy issues that might be of interest to readers.
First, an article (pdf) by Jed Rubenfeld, Robert R. Slaughter Professor at Yale Law, entitled, &#8220;The End of Privacy.&#8221; Rubenfeld raises a number of questions, some of them surprising. I agree with some points but am skeptical of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/two-academic-articles-on-privacy-generally-and-as-connected-with-border-security/2008/11/13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In the News: DC Examiner: New rules proposed for spy net</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/in-the-news-dc-examiner-new-rules-proposed-for-spy-net/2008/11/12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/in-the-news-dc-examiner-new-rules-proposed-for-spy-net/2008/11/12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In the news]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am quoted in a DC Examiner story about Mayor Fenty&#8217;s plan for a city-wide surveillance system, &#8220;New rules proposed for spy net.&#8221;
The Fenty administration has proposed new standards for a consolidated spy network of more than 5,000 closed-circuit cameras that should take effect in time for the presidential inauguration in January.
The Video Interoperability for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/in-the-news-dc-examiner-new-rules-proposed-for-spy-net/2008/11/12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIO: Massachusetts Data Privacy and Security Laws Impact Companies</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/cio-massachusetts-data-privacy-and-security-laws-impact-companies/2008/11/12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/cio-massachusetts-data-privacy-and-security-laws-impact-companies/2008/11/12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CIO has a story detailing new privacy and security laws in Massachusetts and how they affect US companies.
Massachusetts has enacted data privacy and data security regulations that will make it eke out California for the most wide ranging state privacy and security laws &#8212; laws that are likely to impact the policies, practices, procedures, contracts [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/cio-massachusetts-data-privacy-and-security-laws-impact-companies/2008/11/12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groups Urge President-Elect Obama to Focus on Privacy in New Administration (Part II)</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/groups-urge-president-elect-obama-to-focus-on-privacy-in-new-administration-part-ii/2008/11/11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/groups-urge-president-elect-obama-to-focus-on-privacy-in-new-administration-part-ii/2008/11/11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Biometrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Medical data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Presidential transition]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of organizations have created documents to offer the Obama-Biden transition team guidance on priorities in the new administration. The issues are broad, including detainee rights, reproductive health, education, open government, security, and privacy, among others. This is Part Two of an unknown number of posts on such transition plans. I will post documents [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/groups-urge-president-elect-obama-to-focus-on-privacy-in-new-administration-part-ii/2008/11/11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
