<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Privacy Lives &#187; Fourth Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.privacylives.com/category/fourth-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.privacylives.com</link>
	<description>monitoring the pulse of privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Update: FDA says it monitored workers’ e-mail to investigate potential leak</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/update-fda-says-it-monitored-workers-e-mail-to-investigate-potential-leak/2012/02/10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/update-fda-says-it-monitored-workers-e-mail-to-investigate-potential-leak/2012/02/10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, the Washington Post reported that employees at the Food and Drug Administration were suing the agency over the privacy of their personal e-mail: &#8220;The surveillance — detailed in e-mails and memos unearthed by six of the scientists and doctors [...] took place over two years as the plaintiffs accessed their personal Gmail accounts from government computers. Information garnered this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/update-fda-says-it-monitored-workers-e-mail-to-investigate-potential-leak/2012/02/10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA Today: FBI cuts back on GPS surveillance after Supreme Court ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/usa-today-fbi-cuts-back-on-gps-surveillance-after-supreme-court-ruling/2012/02/08/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/usa-today-fbi-cuts-back-on-gps-surveillance-after-supreme-court-ruling/2012/02/08/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, the US Supreme Court ruled in the case of United States v. Jones. In Jones, the police, without a valid warrant, placed a global positioning satellite (GPS) technology device on the car of a suspected drug dealer in Washington, D.C. The police then tracked the movements of Antoine Jones for several weeks with this device, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/usa-today-fbi-cuts-back-on-gps-surveillance-after-supreme-court-ruling/2012/02/08/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Domestic Use of Drones in United States</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-domestic-use-of-drones-in-united-states/2012/02/07/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-domestic-use-of-drones-in-united-states/2012/02/07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last year, that has been increasing focus on the use of aerial drones (also known as unmanned aerial vehicles, “UAVs”) to conduct surveillance in the United States. Last year, the Washington Post had an in-depth report of possible privacy problems with the domestic use of aerial drones, which are commonly used in military operations. (Be sure to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-domestic-use-of-drones-in-united-states/2012/02/07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS Releases New Privacy Impact Assessment Related to EINSTEIN</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-releases-new-privacy-impact-assessment-related-to-einstein/2012/02/03/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-releases-new-privacy-impact-assessment-related-to-einstein/2012/02/03/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Homeland Security&#8217;s Privacy Office has released a new Privacy Impact Assessment (DHS pdf; archive pdf) cybersecurity program Einstein. It is a Bush-era pilot program, continued under Obama, that seeks to have private telecommunications companies route the Internet traffic of civilian government agencies through hardware and software that would search for and block malicious [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-releases-new-privacy-impact-assessment-related-to-einstein/2012/02/03/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Associated Press: U.S. no-fly list doubles in one year</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/associated-press-u-s-no-fly-list-doubles-in-one-year/2012/02/02/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/associated-press-u-s-no-fly-list-doubles-in-one-year/2012/02/02/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Associated Press reports on the U.S. no-fly list. In 2003, Homeland Security Presidential Directive No. 6 consolidated administration of the no-fly, selectee and other security watchlists under the jurisdiction of the Terrorist Screening Center. In 2009, the Justice Department’s Inspector General released a report (pdf) reported substantial problems with the terrorist watchlists. “The Federal Bureau of Investigation has improperly kept [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/associated-press-u-s-no-fly-list-doubles-in-one-year/2012/02/02/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: Official Assails Sharing of Passenger Data</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-official-assails-sharing-of-passenger-data/2012/02/02/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-official-assails-sharing-of-passenger-data/2012/02/02/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times reports on negotiations concerning the sharing of traveler data between European Union countries and the United States: BRUSSELS — Raising the stakes in a trans-Atlantic struggle over data privacy, an influential lawmaker said Tuesday that the European Parliament should reject a deal between the European Union and the United States that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-official-assails-sharing-of-passenger-data/2012/02/02/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Op-Ed at New York Times: GPS and the Right to Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/op-ed-at-new-york-times-gps-and-the-right-to-privacy/2012/01/31/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/op-ed-at-new-york-times-gps-and-the-right-to-privacy/2012/01/31/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, we discussed the US Supreme Court ruling in the case of United States v. Jones. In a unanimous decision (Supreme Court pdf; archive pdf), the court held that police do need a valid warrant to place a GPS device on a vehicle. The majority opinion was premised on the fact that there was a physical trespass, or intrusion, by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/op-ed-at-new-york-times-gps-and-the-right-to-privacy/2012/01/31/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: FDA staffers sue agency over surveillance of personal e-mail</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-fda-staffers-sue-agency-over-surveillance-of-personal-e-mail/2012/01/30/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-fda-staffers-sue-agency-over-surveillance-of-personal-e-mail/2012/01/30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post reports on a lawsuit by employees at the Food and Drug Administration over the privacy of their personal e-mail. The story is a good reminder that technology can allow employers to see and record whatever you do on a work computer. There can be questions as to the legality of employers doing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-fda-staffers-sue-agency-over-surveillance-of-personal-e-mail/2012/01/30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Hawaii Legislators Drop Controversial Internet Data-Retention Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/update-hawaii-legislators-drop-controversial-internet-data-retention-bill/2012/01/30/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/update-hawaii-legislators-drop-controversial-internet-data-retention-bill/2012/01/30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, there was discussion of HB 2288 (pdf) in Hawaii, a bill that could have lead to the state keeping tracking of all Web sites visited, which would raise numerous privacy and civil liberties questions. Now, Computerworld reports that lawmakers in Hawaii have dropped the legislation: Lawmakers in Hawaii on Thursday quietly dropped a bill that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/update-hawaii-legislators-drop-controversial-internet-data-retention-bill/2012/01/30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constitution Project: Recommendations for the Implementation of a Comprehensive and Constitutional Cybersecurity Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/constitution-project-recommendations-for-the-implementation-of-a-comprehensive-and-constitutional-cybersecurity-policy/2012/01/27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/constitution-project-recommendations-for-the-implementation-of-a-comprehensive-and-constitutional-cybersecurity-policy/2012/01/27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Constitution Project has released a new report, &#8220;Recommendations for the Implementation of a Comprehensive and Constitutional Cybersecurity Policy&#8221; (Project pdf; archive pdf), calling on Congress to include strong privacy protections in any cybersecurity legislation it adopts. The report is &#8220;endorsed by legal and policy experts (including former federal judges and prosecutors, retired military and intelligence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/constitution-project-recommendations-for-the-implementation-of-a-comprehensive-and-constitutional-cybersecurity-policy/2012/01/27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

