<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Privacy Lives &#187; Civil liberties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.privacylives.com/category/civil-liberties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.privacylives.com</link>
	<description>monitoring the pulse of privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Update: FDA says it monitored workers’ e-mail to investigate potential leak</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/update-fda-says-it-monitored-workers-e-mail-to-investigate-potential-leak/2012/02/10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/update-fda-says-it-monitored-workers-e-mail-to-investigate-potential-leak/2012/02/10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, the Washington Post reported that employees at the Food and Drug Administration were suing the agency over the privacy of their personal e-mail: &#8220;The surveillance — detailed in e-mails and memos unearthed by six of the scientists and doctors [...] took place over two years as the plaintiffs accessed their personal Gmail accounts from government computers. Information garnered this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/update-fda-says-it-monitored-workers-e-mail-to-investigate-potential-leak/2012/02/10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Op-Ed at New York Times: Facebook Is Using You</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/op-ed-at-new-york-times-facebook-is-using-you/2012/02/09/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/op-ed-at-new-york-times-facebook-is-using-you/2012/02/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lori Andrews, a lawprofessor at Chicago-Kent College of Law and the author of “I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy,” writes an opinion piece at the New York Times concerning privacy and social-networking site Facebook: LAST week, Facebook filed documents with the government that will allow [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/op-ed-at-new-york-times-facebook-is-using-you/2012/02/09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA Today: FBI cuts back on GPS surveillance after Supreme Court ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/usa-today-fbi-cuts-back-on-gps-surveillance-after-supreme-court-ruling/2012/02/08/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/usa-today-fbi-cuts-back-on-gps-surveillance-after-supreme-court-ruling/2012/02/08/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, the US Supreme Court ruled in the case of United States v. Jones. In Jones, the police, without a valid warrant, placed a global positioning satellite (GPS) technology device on the car of a suspected drug dealer in Washington, D.C. The police then tracked the movements of Antoine Jones for several weeks with this device, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/usa-today-fbi-cuts-back-on-gps-surveillance-after-supreme-court-ruling/2012/02/08/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS Data Privacy Committee Releases Privacy and Technology Recommendations for a Federated Information-Sharing System</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-data-privacy-committee-releases-privacy-and-technology-recommendations-for-a-federated-information-sharing-system/2012/02/08/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-data-privacy-committee-releases-privacy-and-technology-recommendations-for-a-federated-information-sharing-system/2012/02/08/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: DPIAC member Barry Steinhardt has written a statement (DPIAC pdf; archive pdf) about the report that he describes as being &#8220;more in the way of a partial concurrence than a pure dissent.&#8221; Steinhardt wrote that he agrees with much of the DPIAC report, &#8220;But, as explained below, I could not vote in favor of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-data-privacy-committee-releases-privacy-and-technology-recommendations-for-a-federated-information-sharing-system/2012/02/08/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Domestic Use of Drones in United States</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-domestic-use-of-drones-in-united-states/2012/02/07/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-domestic-use-of-drones-in-united-states/2012/02/07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last year, that has been increasing focus on the use of aerial drones (also known as unmanned aerial vehicles, “UAVs”) to conduct surveillance in the United States. Last year, the Washington Post had an in-depth report of possible privacy problems with the domestic use of aerial drones, which are commonly used in military operations. (Be sure to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-domestic-use-of-drones-in-united-states/2012/02/07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Camera Surveillance System in Washington, D.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-camera-surveillance-system-in-washington-d-c/2012/02/06/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-camera-surveillance-system-in-washington-d-c/2012/02/06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, then-DC Mayor Adrian Fenty (D) unveiled plans for a city-wide surveillance system  (VIPS). At the time, the Washington Examiner reported: “The Video Interoperability for Public Safety system, or VIPS, links 5,200 District-owned closed-circuit television cameras within a single monitoring office under the Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency. The goal: Assist Homeland Security ‘to rapidly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-camera-surveillance-system-in-washington-d-c/2012/02/06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: Privacy concerns grow in India</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-concerns-grow-in-india/2012/02/06/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-concerns-grow-in-india/2012/02/06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post reports that privacy questions are starting to become more prominent in India: The Indian government’s recent announcement that it taps nearly 300 new phones every day has sparked a debate about privacy in a country that traditionally views such concerns as an ugly offshoot of Western individualism. Indians tend to stress identities of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-concerns-grow-in-india/2012/02/06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS Releases New Privacy Impact Assessment Related to EINSTEIN</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-releases-new-privacy-impact-assessment-related-to-einstein/2012/02/03/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-releases-new-privacy-impact-assessment-related-to-einstein/2012/02/03/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Homeland Security&#8217;s Privacy Office has released a new Privacy Impact Assessment (DHS pdf; archive pdf) cybersecurity program Einstein. It is a Bush-era pilot program, continued under Obama, that seeks to have private telecommunications companies route the Internet traffic of civilian government agencies through hardware and software that would search for and block malicious [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-releases-new-privacy-impact-assessment-related-to-einstein/2012/02/03/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Associated Press: U.S. no-fly list doubles in one year</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/associated-press-u-s-no-fly-list-doubles-in-one-year/2012/02/02/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/associated-press-u-s-no-fly-list-doubles-in-one-year/2012/02/02/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Associated Press reports on the U.S. no-fly list. In 2003, Homeland Security Presidential Directive No. 6 consolidated administration of the no-fly, selectee and other security watchlists under the jurisdiction of the Terrorist Screening Center. In 2009, the Justice Department’s Inspector General released a report (pdf) reported substantial problems with the terrorist watchlists. “The Federal Bureau of Investigation has improperly kept [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/associated-press-u-s-no-fly-list-doubles-in-one-year/2012/02/02/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: Official Assails Sharing of Passenger Data</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-official-assails-sharing-of-passenger-data/2012/02/02/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-official-assails-sharing-of-passenger-data/2012/02/02/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times reports on negotiations concerning the sharing of traveler data between European Union countries and the United States: BRUSSELS — Raising the stakes in a trans-Atlantic struggle over data privacy, an influential lawmaker said Tuesday that the European Parliament should reject a deal between the European Union and the United States that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-official-assails-sharing-of-passenger-data/2012/02/02/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

