<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Privacy Lives &#187; Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.privacylives.com/category/children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.privacylives.com</link>
	<description>monitoring the pulse of privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: Privacy rights activists worry about potential abuse of devices featured at CES</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-rights-activists-worry-about-potential-abuse-of-devices-featured-at-ces/2012/01/11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-rights-activists-worry-about-potential-abuse-of-devices-featured-at-ces/2012/01/11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post reports on possible privacy questions surrounding new technology featured at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas: The thousands of devices debuting Tuesday at the Consumer Electronics Show here demonstrate how tech companies are poised to gather unprecedented insights into consumers’ lives — how much they eat, whether they exercise, when they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-rights-activists-worry-about-potential-abuse-of-devices-featured-at-ces/2012/01/11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Journal: Even Without Legislation, Privacy Will Be a Hot Issue in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/national-journal-even-without-legislation-privacy-will-be-a-hot-issue-in-2012/2012/01/09/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/national-journal-even-without-legislation-privacy-will-be-a-hot-issue-in-2012/2012/01/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, there were a number of bills introduced in Congress concerning privacy and civil liberties, but most have stalled. Some bills introduced last year: Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) introduced the &#8220;Geolocation Privacy and Surveillance (GPS) Act of 2011&#8243; (archive pdf; THOMAS status link for H.R. 2168); Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W. Va.), chairman of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/national-journal-even-without-legislation-privacy-will-be-a-hot-issue-in-2012/2012/01/09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR: Friendly Advice For Teachers: Beware Of Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/npr-friendly-advice-for-teachers-beware-of-facebook/2011/12/12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/npr-friendly-advice-for-teachers-beware-of-facebook/2011/12/12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve noted before how social-networking data — from sites such as MySpace and Facebook — have been used to gather evidence in trials against jurors and defendants, in divorce cases, against employees (which can lead to lawsuits), applicants to colleges and graduate schools, politicians and high school students. We’ve seen it affect applicants to jobs in the United States and abroad. Recently, the Wall Street Journal noted that some employees [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/npr-friendly-advice-for-teachers-beware-of-facebook/2011/12/12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Augusta Chronicle: Check privacy policy on &#8220;Dear Santa&#8221; Web sites</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/augusta-chronicle-check-privacy-policy-on-dear-santa-web-sites/2011/12/05/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/augusta-chronicle-check-privacy-policy-on-dear-santa-web-sites/2011/12/05/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The August Chronicle reports that the Better Business Bureau is urging parents to examine the data-gathering practices and privacy policies at &#8220;Dear Santa&#8221; Web sites: More than 60 domain names have been registered in the name of Santa Claus, offering children a wide range of opportunities to e-mail St. Nick. Sadly, some of the Web [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/augusta-chronicle-check-privacy-policy-on-dear-santa-web-sites/2011/12/05/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TwinCities.com: Minnesota Supreme Court backs families over newborns&#8217; blood storage</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/twincities-com-minnesota-supreme-court-backs-families-over-newborns-blood-storage/2011/11/22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/twincities-com-minnesota-supreme-court-backs-families-over-newborns-blood-storage/2011/11/22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=14941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TwinCities.com reports on a case concerning the storage of newborn babies&#8217; blood in Minnesota. I’ve written before about the unauthorized or unknowing retention and use of babies’ blood samples for purposes other than disease screening. The Washington Post has written about the ethics and privacy issues when children’s medical data is collected and retained without parents’ knowledge [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/twincities-com-minnesota-supreme-court-backs-families-over-newborns-blood-storage/2011/11/22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: When Sites Drag the Unwitting Across the Web</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-when-sites-drag-the-unwitting-across-the-web/2011/11/15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-when-sites-drag-the-unwitting-across-the-web/2011/11/15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=14879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times reports on the issue of online identification via data mining of disparate Web sites to create files on individuals and how this profiling can draw include children: Consider the case of Maggie Leifer McGary, mother, blogger and social media fan. Ms. McGary is on virtually every existing social network: Foursquare, LinkedIn, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/new-york-times-when-sites-drag-the-unwitting-across-the-web/2011/11/15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU: Students have a right to privacy in their cell phones</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/aclu-students-have-a-right-to-privacy-in-their-cell-phones/2011/11/14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/aclu-students-have-a-right-to-privacy-in-their-cell-phones/2011/11/14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=14865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ACLU of California has released a new report, &#8220;Hello! Students have a right to privacy in their cell phones&#8221; (pdf), concerning the privacy rights of students in California schools. From the introduction: Indiscriminate searches of students’ cell phones threaten students’ privacy rights in ways that have never before been possible. Sweeping searches threaten to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/aclu-students-have-a-right-to-privacy-in-their-cell-phones/2011/11/14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Monday: Unintended consequences of the ‘Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act’</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/first-monday-unintended-consequences-of-the-%e2%80%98children%e2%80%99s-online-privacy-protection-act%e2%80%99/2011/11/02/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/first-monday-unintended-consequences-of-the-%e2%80%98children%e2%80%99s-online-privacy-protection-act%e2%80%99/2011/11/02/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=14781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501-6508, was passed in 1998. The issue of children&#8217;s privacy is being debated again. The Federal Trade Commission, which held a roundtable on children’s online privacy protections last year in Washington, D.C., is now seeking public comments on proposed amendments to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection (COPPA) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/first-monday-unintended-consequences-of-the-%e2%80%98children%e2%80%99s-online-privacy-protection-act%e2%80%99/2011/11/02/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NextGov: Facial recognition apps spark privacy concerns in Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/nextgov-facial-recognition-apps-spark-privacy-concerns-in-congress/2011/10/21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/nextgov-facial-recognition-apps-spark-privacy-concerns-in-congress/2011/10/21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=14635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NextGov reports on privacy questions concerning facial recognition systems as the biometric technology become more popular: As social media firms and law enforcement agencies increasingly use facial recognition technology to facilitate public and online service, privacy issues surrounding the commercial apps, at least, are raising eyebrows in Congress. On Wednesday, Sen. John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/nextgov-facial-recognition-apps-spark-privacy-concerns-in-congress/2011/10/21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: Children’s Internet Privacy Comes Into Congress’ View</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-children%e2%80%99s-internet-privacy-comes-into-congress%e2%80%99-view/2011/10/06/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-children%e2%80%99s-internet-privacy-comes-into-congress%e2%80%99-view/2011/10/06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 06:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=14482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post reports on discussion in the U.S. House concerning children&#8217;s online privacy protections: House lawmakers on Wednesday debated proposed updates to the Children’s Online Private Protection rules, the government’s first effort to tweak 12-year-old laws to better apply to the proliferation of new mobile devices and Internet applications being used by children. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-children%e2%80%99s-internet-privacy-comes-into-congress%e2%80%99-view/2011/10/06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

