<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Privacy Lives &#187; Cameras</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.privacylives.com/category/cameras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.privacylives.com</link>
	<description>monitoring the pulse of privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Domestic Use of Drones in United States</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-domestic-use-of-drones-in-united-states/2012/02/07/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-domestic-use-of-drones-in-united-states/2012/02/07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last year, that has been increasing focus on the use of aerial drones (also known as unmanned aerial vehicles, “UAVs”) to conduct surveillance in the United States. Last year, the Washington Post had an in-depth report of possible privacy problems with the domestic use of aerial drones, which are commonly used in military operations. (Be sure to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-domestic-use-of-drones-in-united-states/2012/02/07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Camera Surveillance System in Washington, D.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-camera-surveillance-system-in-washington-d-c/2012/02/06/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-camera-surveillance-system-in-washington-d-c/2012/02/06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, then-DC Mayor Adrian Fenty (D) unveiled plans for a city-wide surveillance system  (VIPS). At the time, the Washington Examiner reported: “The Video Interoperability for Public Safety system, or VIPS, links 5,200 District-owned closed-circuit television cameras within a single monitoring office under the Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency. The goal: Assist Homeland Security ‘to rapidly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/update-on-camera-surveillance-system-in-washington-d-c/2012/02/06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: Privacy concerns grow in India</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-concerns-grow-in-india/2012/02/06/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-concerns-grow-in-india/2012/02/06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post reports that privacy questions are starting to become more prominent in India: The Indian government’s recent announcement that it taps nearly 300 new phones every day has sparked a debate about privacy in a country that traditionally views such concerns as an ugly offshoot of Western individualism. Indians tend to stress identities of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-concerns-grow-in-india/2012/02/06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computerworld (New Zealand): 15 worst Internet privacy scandals of all time</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/computerworld-new-zealand-15-worst-internet-privacy-scandals-of-all-time/2012/01/27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/computerworld-new-zealand-15-worst-internet-privacy-scandals-of-all-time/2012/01/27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of International Data Privacy Day, Computerworld in New Zealand has rounded up what it believes to be the 15 worst Internet privacy scandals: These high-profile privacy scandals involve many underlying technologies, from search to social media, e-mail to voice mail, mobile phones to Webcams to GPS. But at the heart of all of these privacy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/computerworld-new-zealand-15-worst-internet-privacy-scandals-of-all-time/2012/01/27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: Privacy group seeks to lift veil on domestic drones</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-group-seeks-to-lift-veil-on-domestic-drones/2012/01/17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-group-seeks-to-lift-veil-on-domestic-drones/2012/01/17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last year, that has been increasing focus on the use of aerial drones (also known as unmanned aerial vehicles, “UAVs”) to conduct surveillance in the United States. Last year, the Washington Post had an in-depth report of possible privacy problems with the domestic use of aerial drones, which are commonly used in military operations. (Be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-privacy-group-seeks-to-lift-veil-on-domestic-drones/2012/01/17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Op-Ed in National Times (Australia): Privacy is about individual choice, online and off</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/op-ed-in-national-times-australia-privacy-is-about-individual-choice-online-and-off/2012/01/11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/op-ed-in-national-times-australia-privacy-is-about-individual-choice-online-and-off/2012/01/11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an opinion column at the National Times in Australia, Kathryn Koromilas makes the case that online and offline individual privacy still exists: The New York Time&#8217;s Nick Bilton announced recently that &#8220;privacy is on its deathbed&#8221;. This prediction was prompted by the &#8220;creepy&#8221; ease with which he hunted down the identity of a girl with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/op-ed-in-national-times-australia-privacy-is-about-individual-choice-online-and-off/2012/01/11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS Releases Privacy Impact Assessment on FAST/Passive Methods for Precision Behavioral Screening</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-releases-privacy-impact-assessment-on-fastpassive-methods-for-precision-behavioral-screening/2012/01/11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-releases-privacy-impact-assessment-on-fastpassive-methods-for-precision-behavioral-screening/2012/01/11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Homeland Security&#8217;s Privacy Office has released a privacy impact assessment, &#8220;Future Attribute Screening Technology (FAST)/Passive Methods for Precision Behavioral Screening, DHS/S&#38;T/PIA-012(a)&#8221; (DHS pdf; archive pdf); this is an update to a Privacy Impact Assessment (pdf) released in 2008. FAST, which I wrote about four years ago, seeks to divine an individual’s criminal or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/dhs-releases-privacy-impact-assessment-on-fastpassive-methods-for-precision-behavioral-screening/2012/01/11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC Seeks Public Comment on Facial Recognition Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/ftc-seeks-public-comment-on-facial-recognition-technology/2012/01/09/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/ftc-seeks-public-comment-on-facial-recognition-technology/2012/01/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been increasing privacy and civil liberty questions raised as the use facial recognition technology has increased in companies&#8217; advertising and criminal investigations. As identification technology becomes cheaper and more prevalent, it could easily unmask people and track their movements. Those who were previously part of the unnamed crowd could be singled out for identification. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/ftc-seeks-public-comment-on-facial-recognition-technology/2012/01/09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent Stories About Consumers and Tracking of Their Shopping Habits</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/recent-stories-about-consumers-and-tracking-of-their-shopping-habits/2012/01/06/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/recent-stories-about-consumers-and-tracking-of-their-shopping-habits/2012/01/06/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tracking of consumers&#8217; shopping habits (online and offline) for targeted behavioral advertising and other types of marketing is not new. There have been numerous news stories about this surveillance issue. For example, after the Wall Street Journal reported that credit-card companies Visa and MasterCard “are pushing into a new business: using what they know about [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/recent-stories-about-consumers-and-tracking-of-their-shopping-habits/2012/01/06/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: As Web sites come and go, so too could the information you entrust them with</title>
		<link>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-as-web-sites-come-and-go-so-too-could-the-information-you-entrust-them-with/2012/01/05/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-as-web-sites-come-and-go-so-too-could-the-information-you-entrust-them-with/2012/01/05/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>privacy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacylives.com/?p=15263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post looks at how Web sites can be ephemeral, and the data you give that site could disappear or you could lose control over the photos, videos, or other information on the site. As a flood of family photos, videos and holiday greetings hits the Internet this time of year, online users will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privacylives.com/washington-post-as-web-sites-come-and-go-so-too-could-the-information-you-entrust-them-with/2012/01/05/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

