Comments on: Associated Press: Scalia speaks on digital privacy at NYC conference http://www.privacylives.com/associated-press-scalia-speaks-on-digital-privacy-at-nyc-conference/2009/01/28/ monitoring the pulse of privacy Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:17:30 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Privacy Lives http://www.privacylives.com/associated-press-scalia-speaks-on-digital-privacy-at-nyc-conference/2009/01/28/comment-page-1/#comment-4915 Privacy Lives Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:07:08 +0000 http://www.privacylives.com/?p=1692#comment-4915 Thanks for the comment. I read Solove's post and the discussion in the comments with interest. Thanks for the comment. I read Solove’s post and the discussion in the comments with interest.

]]> By: Logical Extremes http://www.privacylives.com/associated-press-scalia-speaks-on-digital-privacy-at-nyc-conference/2009/01/28/comment-page-1/#comment-4912 Logical Extremes Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:04:08 +0000 http://www.privacylives.com/?p=1692#comment-4912 Daniel Solove had an interesting note on a prior decision in which Scalia was in the majority... "Moreover, the [US Supreme] Court [Department of Defense v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487 (1994)] noted that “[a]n individual's interest in controlling the dissemination of information regarding personal matters does not dissolve simply because that information may be available to the public in some form.” Id. at 500." http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/justice_scalias_1.html Daniel Solove had an interesting note on a prior decision in which Scalia was in the majority…

“Moreover, the [US Supreme] Court [Department of Defense v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487 (1994)] noted that “[a]n individual’s interest in controlling the dissemination of information regarding personal matters does not dissolve simply because that information may be available to the public in some form.” Id. at 500.”

http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/justice_scalias_1.html

]]>